.one year later.: the politics of relocation and relation

I was going to start this post with an apology for its divergence from the usual academic, think-y pieces I try to write and toward a more personal, reflection piece. But the graduate student in me wouldn’t let me not ground this in theory; so, in looking back upon my one-year anniversary in Minneapolis, marking my one-year survival as a PhD student, I turn to Aimee Carrillo Rowe (affectionately referred to as ACR) to help me frame what has been a terrifically salacious, surprisingly delicious, and altogether hellish twelve months.

Before I bring in ACR, I need to share what I wrote in a former online blog exactly one year ago today. It was a few days after my arrival in Minneapolis, and I was perhaps still somewhat in denial that I had really left Chicago, my home for the six years prior. I remember sitting in a coffee shop, fighting back tears as I projected optimism into the keyboard. In it I discuss what I describe as “the hum of Chicago’s electric air,” and wonder if I’ll ever find the kind of vivacious community, the feeling of really living, that I found there. I reflected:

“Only after I left the city did I realize that the only time in my life I had actually been immersed in such an epically poetic description of organic vitality was in Chicago for the past six life-altering years. The relationships I made on the streets, (the streets that fell upon one another in their seamless grid’d dance), the love I made in the beds of apartments set behind sidewalks with impossible-to-describe colored streetlights, (the sidewalks with cracks and heart-framed initials and footprint’d stories of failure and hope and promise and regret), the way the wind felt against my face as I scavangered through cars on my bicycle, the potentiality of our protests, and the harmony of our laughter on late-night el platforms…..all of it, all of it created the stirring hum that aroused electric currents to pulse through the skies of Chicago, and through my wanting, impressionable veins. Chicago is alive because of the people within it, and the people within it are alive because of the city itself. Our public space becomes an entity that both simultaneously shapes and is shaped by the creation of community—be it intentional, organic, or incidental. While there are a diverse and multifaceted blend of sub-communities, there is no denying that the city on the whole is a space of some common energy that fosters (at least the semblance of) unity.”

So did I find an equivalent in my new dwellings? As one of the professors in my department likes to say, “Yes and no.” This past year I’ve been that annoying city-girl who is quick to mention how Chicago is superior whenever she can; and there have plenty of times to participate in this obnoxious behavior: any time public transit comes up (the el is perfection compared to these buses), the skyline (weak sauce), the “lakes” (psh, they ain’t got nothin’ on Lake Michigan). And that hum? That buzz of electricity that stirs my veins? Absent.

But there is something here, something in these twin cities that is comforting and stable in a way that Chicago could never be. It nestles me in the shoulders of bicycle paths, cozies me in the plenitude of locally-owned coffee shops, and I can feel it, everyday, trying to rescue me from my big-city-life bad habits (like cynicism, and total distrust, and a fervent addiction to doing things the hard way). The people are openly kind, and even though everyone says that “Minnesota nice” is not sincere, sometimes it’s refreshing anyway (like all the times I’ve been lost, and within a moment of seeing a confused expression upon my face, strangers approach asking if I need help. Wow!).

Now, my actual PhD program is kind of the opposite of all that. Grad school beats the shit out of you. I have an increased propensity for self-flagellation, I work far more than forty hours a week (couldn’t even count if I tried; I’d probably cry), and have a general sense of self-doubt, feelings of worthlessness, and wonder whether or not it’s possible to “make a difference” as a professor…..

But here’s where theory saves us. (Which, incidentally, answers the above question, non?). Bring in ACR’s “Be Longing: Towards a Feminist Politics of Relation” (2005), which urges us to reframe traditional feminist notions of “standpoint” (e.g., I am: white, female, queer, working-class, Midwesterner, etc.) and instead think about the people that constitute home. She writes,

“My argument is that who we love is political. That sites of our belonging constitute how we see the world, what we value, who we are [becoming]….Be Longing, two words, placed beside each other, not run together, phrases a command. The command is to be “be” “longing,” not to be still, or be quiet, but to be longing.”

In the last 365 days I have: reluctantly and painfully parted ways with Chicago, warmed up to the okay-for-now charm of Minneapolis, endured the bittersweet trials of academic abuse, and, most importantly, fallen in love with so many new minds and hearts. ACR tells us that it’s okay to examine what it means to be “home,” and quotes Kamala Visweswaran (1994), who states: “Home, once interrogated, is a place we’ve never been before.” For me, ‘home’ now means both Cleveland (where I was born and raised for 18 years), and also Chicago, where I lived some of the most formative years of my life. And now, when I go visit family in Cleveland or friends in Chicago, when I hug them goodbye and say “It’s hard to go home…” I am referring to returning to Minneapolis-home, but also stating that it is hard, so hard to go to any of these homes. And although the geography of Chicago makes me yearn like a hungry lover to be in it and upon it and amidst it, my three homes are mostly what they are because of the relationships I’ve made there.

“We tend to overlook the ways that power is transmitted through our affective ties,” ACR writes, “Who we love, the communities that we live in, who we expend our emotional energies building ties with—these connections are all functions of power.”

It is hard to compare the affective networks of Cleveland, Chicago and Minneapolis, because I was obviously in entirely different places in my life when I was introduced and belonged to each. I think any city that got a hold of me from 18-24 might have felt the most magical; it was then when I established a sense of identity that felt more right than anything had before. I discovered radical politics and the fluidity of sexuality and academic theory and occupying streets and office buildings (and really believing that each action was a step closer to justice); I discovered the vodka-laced conversations and smoke-filled lips and public transit at 2am and playing music in living rooms where everyone knows all the words….Everything felt “epic.”

Here, the moments don’t feel quite so epic, but they do feel powerful and strong and stable. These are all fairly new sentiments for me to describe relationships. Here, I have developed rock-solid friendships with four of the most inspiring, intelligent women I’ve ever met. We discuss our lives interlaced with theories we’ve read, we are self-aware about our contradictions, and lovingly care for one another’s mistakes. Here, I have found a community of activists and organizers that are concerned with building more than radical identity, but also a movement. Here, I have found radical queers that are interested in smashing the state, but believe it will take more than glitter and public sex. Here, I have felt more comfortable in my queer identity than almost ever before; comfortable enough to devote nearly all my reading and writing to queer projects. Interestingly enough, it is here that I have fallen in love with a cisgender man who inspires me, supports me, and challenges me to be the best queer academic and social justice warrior I can be.

In short, here, I have grown up.

ACR continues,

“A politics of relation is not striving toward an absolute alterity to the self, but rather to tip the concept of “subjectivity” away from “individuality” and in the direction of the inclination toward the other so that “being” is constituted not first through the “Self,” but through its own longings to be with. Belonging precedes being….Thus there is no separation between longing—to be with—and being.” (p. 18)

When I long for home, I am deconstructing my notion of self and simultaneously creating my identity-as-relational. When I feel love for the past or the present, I am, in those affective yearnings, becoming. And there is something deeply comforting in missing the past when you know it is a necessary step for self-actualization. And there is something deeply motivating to loving the present when you know that it too is a necessary step for self-actualization.

When I look back on that love letter to the city-scape of Chicago, I grow nostalgic. But I am also grateful for the distance, for the ways I approach life more maturely for having left it.

ACR begins her essay noting that she’s writing from her girlfriend’s “puffy red chair perched by the window, looking out over the lake as fall blows into Iowa” (p. 1). I write to you from my desk chair, my baby-cat, Stokely, curled up beside me, feeling the relief of a cool August-night breeze, and waiting for my partner to return home from work. I am “home” here in a way that I have never been home elsewhere, and I have learned that trying to determine if it is better or worse than this or that is an exercise in futility.

ACR’s essay turns into a rich analysis of coalition-building, and especially interrogates whiteness and heterosexuality within feminist movements. She pushes us to consider how loving across difference can “widen our vision of the political field” (36), and continues,

“…[O]ur belonging are conditioned by our bodies and where they are placed on the globe. And yet, the point of “differential belonging” is to call attention to the multiple paths we may travel in our circles of belonging, and to consider the implications for each on the other. It is not to be bound by the regulatory practices of any particular group nor by the need to remain consistent or ‘pure,’ but rather to take a risk and move in the direction of multiple others. As in ‘becoming-other’” (p. 36).

One year ago I took a huge risk, and I have become-other, many others, and my heart overflows with gratitude for that.

So, happy one-year anniversary to me. Happy one-year anniversary to the ‘me’ that is only a product of the many, many relationships that have shaped me, the relationships that have enabled me to write this today. I took up Visweswaran’s challenge and interrogated home in a way that makes it unfamiliar, but it is because of be/longing that the unfamiliar has become a much less scary place to exist.

.august to august: one year later.

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “.one year later.: the politics of relocation and relation

  1. Well, I for one am totally glad you moved here. 🙂

    I really relate to this post, which is a great one by the way. I was a very similar “annoying city-girl who is quick to mention how Chicago is superior whenever she can” for like 3 years. No matter where I was I constantly was like “this is cool, like that place in Chicago that’s bigger and better!” basically until we moved to our current place, which really is different and a trade up and not a paler shade of Chicago. It’s tough because Chicago is a genuinely world class city, while Minneapolis is an excellent regional city about 1/9th or so the size. (I had the same experience moving out of Edinburgh and going backpacking in 2001 or so, every place Ang and I went to we were like “this is cool; Edinburgh’s even cooler and prettier” until we got to Prague and were like “oh damn….”)

    Ang and I took a trip to New York for a wedding a while back. We’d always had a Chicago-patriot attitude about New York (“second city my ass!”) but we got off the train and came up in New York and there was totally that electricity in the air. New York was the cool well dressed person across the room saying smart things whose eye you may have caught but you’re not at all sure and you’re scared to find out but how can you *not* find out, and after the party you can’t stop thinking about them. Minneapolis is the perfectly nice person with nothing wrong with them that your relatives keep trying to get you to go on a date with because they will be a good provider and they have good character, there’s not the same spark. We came home from New York and were totally like “it’s not you Minneapolis, it’s me, some day you’ll find the right person who will really love you.”

    About grad school kicking you in the face emotionally, I feel that too, and it feeds my urge to apologize too much. I can’t remember if I said this before, but I can’t possibly recommend this book The Ignorant Schoolmaster highly enough. It’s by Jacques Ranciere and it helped me a ton with the emotional wringer of grad school when I was considering throwing in the towel. (If you do read it I’d love to hear your thoughts on it.)

    Looking forward to seeing you soon.

    take care,
    Nate

    • Thanks for this response, Nate. Love your cool-person-at-the-party analogy….It’s funny, because I keep thinking about how I might be drawn to find jobs in NYC because I know that I would fall in love with it like I did Chicago…

      You didn’t mention that book before, but I’ll definitely keep it in mind when I find some time (ha!) to read non-class stuff.

      I look forward to seeing you in a couple hours! yeah!

  2. Thank you, I enjoyed reading this.

    You are right, there is something about Chicago. I got to visit there, only for a couple of days at a time, three times in the past six months, and yeah. There is something. It’s so BIG, and yet it doesn’t look down its nose at me for not being somebody-enough, the way parts of DC have always done. Chicago is an adventure waiting to happen.

    Minneapolis, though – over the course of my first year here, I’ve fallen in love with it. Not the kind of love you’re talking about, with that electric hum, but the kind that’s safe and sweet and good and warm and home, a hearth to return to always. I was really conflicted about being away for so much of the summer: how could I complain when I was getting to do the research I had spent years of my life scrabbling to get into grad school to do? Yet, there were stretches of days when more than anything I just wanted to be home.

    Maybe, as for you, part of it is the contrast with what I came from. When I left DC I left behind a very close friendship of many years which, as a couple of people have pointed out to me, could fairly be termed an emotionally abusive relationship, or at the very least a controlling and unhealthy one. It never occurred to me to look for that kind of thing in a relationship that wasn’t romantic, but there it is and there it was. So, because of that, Minneapolis to me is the freedom to walk the streets and taste the air and smile and feel and do and be, just as my spirit moves me, without that constant undercurrent of worry that the other shoe is about to fall on my head.

    And I just cannot get over the weather. All spring it was absolutely incredibly perfect and beautiful. And now it is again. It makes up for the winter ten times over. It really, really does.

    Grad school is terrifying but it’s also incredibly rewarding. I also have that constant fear that I’ll be measured and found wanting, and yet, I keep coming back to the reaction of my undergrad advisor when I told him I’d been accepted here: he giggled like a little boy and beamed at me and congratulated me, and said, “They’re going to pay you to read books!” And yes, it’s not QUITE that easy, but it’s such an incredibly worthwhile experience compared to just about any other job I’ve ever had that I don’t want to be anywhere else – at least not for the moment.

    I do go on, don’t I? Thank you for this post and for the chance to share my own experience.

    • That’s a touching reflection, thank you for sharing. I understand how empowering it can feel to walk away from an abusive relationship (i had a similar situation when i left chicago), so there is something to be said for that, for sure.

      And you’re right about grad school. I complain, but I stay because there is no place I’d rather be….

      See you soon!

  3. I followed your link expecting a reflection on your thesis a year plus change later, but this was just as interesting. I am glad you’re working out your time there and not letting it work you over.

    I’ve always thought ACR offered a nice negotiation of sameness and difference (if a little light on some of the messier details), and I’m reminded of that fondness through your use here. I started to write my own theoretical response, but with my own Ph.D. program starting Monday I think I should keep quiet else I’ll be tired of my own words before the year begins.

    I too recommend Ranciere. He would however put being prior to belonging, which is a turn I am interested in but that may aggravate you.

  4. Oh Rach.

    The way you describe Chicago is pitch perfect. It captures the feeling I, too, have always have when I am either there or missing it too much. It has been so difficult to be away from it, and I too have been (sometimes still am) the city-girl who thinks Chicago is always better.

    As I contemplate leaving Chicago even farther behind, contemplate moving even farther away, for a longer period of time, my heart does these funny little flops. But I think we proved last weekend that anywhere our “Chicago” friends come together, we can create our own electric hum and feel truly alive.

    So much love
    M

    • Meagan,

      I couldn’t agree more. It was truly amazing the way I felt like it was exactly 2005/6ish last weekend. It was so beautiful, I became very emotional reflecting on it on the plane ride home and the evening that followed.

      It’s just sad we can’t make that happen more often.

      Love you tons. ❤

  5. Chicago is a beautiful place. To the end of my life I will always love cities. Last weekend I was able to spend time at an arts festival blocks from my house, go to the beach, eat meals from thailand, ethiopia, costa rica, and sweden. I went to Mass at my church and go to a revolutionary workshop.

    What this makes me think of is that to me, the beauty of Chicago or rather cities in general, is people.

    It is through the diversity of culture and ideas that we are able to experience the world, and the great cities of the world bring this together.

    To me, home will never be Chicago, home and where I grew up and where my ideas about the world were formed was a much smaller city. Where I could see the world through blocks, where the Fins of Highlandtown were always a sea of (a heavy drinking) respite, after walking past the Ukrainian and Polish women washing their steps, or yelling at their children. Where the Orthodox churchs always had the weirdest sounds and smells. Where I could smell the Olives and Feta of Greek town and was paid in pastries for walking dogs or carrying groceries. And you could never find a place to park, or even sit in Little Italy, and you knew you weren’t really wanted there unless you had money to spend because like it or not, these five blocks were an exclave of Sicily.

    I love cities, because, after years of thinking that I love the buildings, I have figured out that I love people. It is through them and not concrete and steel that I can expierence the joys of the world and of life.

    • “….after years of thinking that I love the buildings, I have figured out that I love the people.” Nicely said! You know I love cities too, but what I wrote above reminds me that it is indeed the people. It’s like my silly song: “they say the city’s gonna swallow us alive/but i hope you’re there by my side/these sidewalks aren’t the only things that document our memories/cause i still got my heart to remember our big dreams.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s